85% of Tree Structure Possesses Risks in Urban Area
Green Group Urges the Administration on Legislation and Resource to Protect Trees

 

The Conservancy Association (CA) conducted a large-scale tree survey in the second half of this year. The survey reveals that over 85% of the trees in housing estates and along roadsides have potential structural risk which will prone to collapse if no proper conservation measures are taken. The survey again shows trees in Hong Kong are not properly protected. The Administration should legislate for trees and increase the resources to protect trees and safeguard public safety.

With the aid of hundreds of “Tree Lovers”, CA conducted a tree survey in the second half of this year. The survey is divided into two parts: trees in housing estates and along roadsides, as well as Old and Valuable Trees (OVT). The first part studied 339 trees and was conducted from July to December 2007 in 11 estates and the roadsides nearby. The result was that 85% of them had structural problems, 90% had been improperly pruned, 87% had insufficient space to grow, 19% had been damaged by human activity.

Structural problems include decay, cavity, leaning, over-growth of canopy and so on. Although a tree may look healthy in appearance, if these problems are not taken care of properly, fragile parts of the tree will be easily broken and may eventually leads to collapse. Proper maintenance works should include correct pruning of canopy and support by appropriate tools.

Although the condition of OVTs is better than trees on housing estates and along roadsides, it is still not satisfactory. CA started the survey on OVTs from September 2007, and studied 133 out of the then 526 OVTs. It was found that 52% of them had structural problems, 93% was poorly pruned, 91% had insufficient space to grow, 33% lacked protection, and 10% lacked proper management and monitoring.

 
 

Two OVTs with structural problems in Mongkok

 

Although the Administration claims that there is a series of administrative and legislative measures for tree conservation in place, as well as professional tree experts in various departments, the reality is simply not satisfactory. The major problems of current tree conservation are no legislation and lack of resources, transparency and monitoring. When public or green groups ask for information regarding the removal or felling of trees in public places or along roadsides, the Administration cannot provide enough information about the trees past conditions and justification for removal or felling them.

Current mechanism for OVT lacks transparency. When these trees are removed or added into the Register of Old and Valuable Trees, the public simply do not know. Regarding the OVTs died of “unidentified reasons,” it should not be tolerated. We urge the Administraion to increase transparency on tree conservation works so as to let the public effectively monitor the Administration’s efforts. Pruning OVTs should be undertaken by trained professionals and be monitored. The Administration should also try to enlarge protection area of the trees to provide enough growing space and prevent damage by human activities. CA will continue to study the remaining OVTs.

While the Administration should be responsible for tree legislation and resource redeployment, education is equally important. The survey found that 19% of trees in estates and along roadsides were damaged by human activities which reveals that some people still do not aware of the importance of tree conservation. As such, CA launched the Tree Lovers Tree Conservation Programme in 2006. Through a series of activities including seminars, field trips, training for identifying health problem of trees, it is hoped that awareness of tree conservation could be heightened and cultivate the sense to appreciate trees and nature. This year, we have trained 470 “Tree Lovers” and hundreds of them assisted in tree survey.

 

Trees on Housing Estates and Roadsides: 339

 

Improper Pruning

90%

Insufficient Space for Growth

87%

Structural Problem

85%

Human Damages

19%

 
 

OVT: 133

 

Improper Pruning

93%

Insufficient Space for Growth

91%

Structural Problem

52%

Insufficient Protection

33%

Improper Management and Monitoring

10%