Hosted By

Joint Statement on the Reorganization of the Environment Bureau

 

7 June 2007

 

The recent government proposal to restructure the Environment Bureau envisages that the Permanent Secretary for the Environment will double up as the Director for Environmental Protection (DEP), and that this post will effectively be taken up by an Administrative Officer. As civil society groups dedicated to a better environment, we believe that such arrangement will be harmful to the public interest for the following reasons:

Much of the work of environmental protection and conservation best practice and even policy-making is necessarily within the area of specialist professional scientific and engineering expertise. In such areas, it is essential that the most careful consideration be given to which posts should be filled by professional grades and if necessary, the appropriate rank or status accorded to them. The DEP is the top expert within the government to offer professional advice to the Chief Executive in Council and to other government departments with regard to all issues related to the environment. Therefore this post should only be taken up by a professional scientist or engineer with relevant training, expertise and credibility in the subject matter concerned.

It is clear that the statutory functions and powers of the Director of Environmental Protection under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance require that the post of Director be filled by a person with the necessary professional and technical expertise. It is therefore inappropriate that the post should be twinned with that of the Permanent Secretary and be filled by one person who does not have the requisite professional and technical expertise. That the post of Director is and is intended to be independent is clear from section 3 which requires the Director to report to the Chief Secretary for the Administration any act or failure in contravention of the Ordinance on the part of any public officer.

A constant turnover of administrative officers who have little understanding of the issues involved fails to ensure the necessary continuity and advocacy for this most important work of Government and will eventually lead to the erosion of professional expertise to the detriment of the public interest. Such an official will also not be able to command the necessary respect from civil society groups which are essential partners of the government to fulfill its mission of environmental protection.

We appeal to the government to ensure that the post of Director of Environmental Protection is separate from the post of Permanent Secretary and be filled by a professional staff with the necessary technical expertise required to offer impartial advice to the government, and to carry out the statutory duties imposed upon the Director under the EIA Ordinance. This cannot and should not to be performed by someone wearing two hats. We also urge the government to apply the same principle to Agricultural, Fisheries and Conservation Department, and appoint a professional scientist to take up the directorship.

Co-signatories: (In alphabetical order)

Clear the Air
The Conservancy Association
Green Lantau Association
Green Sense
Green Student Council
The living Islands Movement
WWF Hong Kong